ZitatOriginally posted by Dreamsat2
1- I never stated that what you mentioned that the new drivers are in the current CVS repository, I said it will be in future CVS, but it seems you, like all other Canadian clone lovers, love to put words in people's mouth, that they didn't say.
I'll refer you to your own words:
This was in response to hemi's question
Zitat
go ahead and take a look at latest CVS, it has both built-in
followed a little later by:
Zitat
just be patient and let us, me, you, and everyone, see what is coming out from DMM.
Zitat
2- There is always a close relation between DMM and ihad, and there will always be. And I never said that to make myself look important or not, but again, these words of you, are the Canadian Clone Lovers way of disrespecting good people.
Then why not explain a little better exactly why we'd be surprised at the relationship? It seems kind of superfluous then to state like you did:
Zitat
I am saying it again, it is unknown to most people what is ihad - TGP - DMM and the relation between the three.
Zitat
3- I am not a dealer for Dreambox, and I am certainley not a clone dealer, and since you do not know who I am or what I do, it is very stupid from you to judge my sense of business.
I guess I answered all your questions. Now, you can go back to your Clone Loving Board called CloneBoxForNewbies, where newbies are always flamed if they ask simple questions.
I never implied you were a clone dealer, however your combative method of responding to what are legitimate questions should make you reconsider how you address people because it sure makes it seem like you have a vested financial interest in the sales of DMM products.
Again you request I go back to a board you appear to have issues with although lord knows why seeing as you appear to be such an easy chap to get along with. [/sarcasm off]. In reading this entire thread, you are the only one who immediately resorts to pettiness and namecalling instead of acting like an adult and answering questions addressing concerns owners of legitimate DMM boxes may have, myself included.
Until a clearcut explanation is made public of exactly what method was used to identify the clones, I sure as heck will not be putting any new images on any of my boxes lest uneknown to me the MAC of my true DM falls within a range that may also be used by a clone. I appreciate that the full method of how identification was done may be hard to make public because it would enable those very people DMM is trying to limit in their production to circumvent countermeasures, however at this point no owner of a DMM can be sure that a Gemini image using the new head.ko file only provided to Gemini is safe.
Maybe for once you can respond like an adult instead of basically telling me to naff off.